2012-05-04, 13:24 | Link #21 | |
( ಠ_ಠ)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere, between the sacred silence and sleep
|
Quote:
It's not a re-run, it's actually a re-make. In fact, the manga is called Rurouni Kenshin Cinema Version. And yes, it's by Watsuki. Spoiler:
__________________
|
|
2012-05-04, 23:37 | Link #22 |
Licensed Hunter-a-holic
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 35
|
So is there any value in getting the Jump SQ issue then? Or should I skip on importing it?
I mean does Watsuki at least leave some kind of commentary or anything of the sort in the issue ... that was half the goodness in a RK volume, reading Watsuki's thoughts about the development and creation of his manga. without even that, I find it a disappointing turn of events to be honest Oh well, there is the live action movie to look forward to I suppose. It looks to be fun at least.
__________________
|
2012-05-06, 20:09 | Link #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
And the seemingly new movie villain (I'm assuming) is rather reminiscent of Jinei. |
|
2012-05-16, 02:49 | Link #24 |
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kobe, Japan
|
I confess a certain amount of surprise at the negative reaction to the first chapter. It's certainly rushed - but given that it's either loosely or closely tracking the plot of the live-action film, I figured the intro would be a rush job.
Bottom line for me? The art is Watsuki, and it still looks like RK. The interaction among Kenshin, Kaoru and Yahiko is true to form. And the pacing will slow down now that the intros are out of the way. I'm excited to have RuroKen back in the hands of the master, and I'd take Kinema Ban over a hundred Shin-Kyoto Hen any day of the week.
__________________
|
2012-05-16, 19:13 | Link #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Yeah, it probably helps that Shin Kyoto Hen having been the travesty it was caused my expectations for any new Kenshin material to plummet down to zero, but Kinema Ban was surprisingly enjoyable and true to the spirit of the series. Guess that's the difference a Watsuki instead of an Okada makes.
Obviously I still don't expect anything quite as good as the original run, since it's been all but confirmed to be a short run whose main intent is to promote the Live Action films, but after DEEN's butchering of the series it does feel pretty good to have RuroKen back in the hands of someone who gets it. |
2012-05-16, 23:11 | Link #26 | |
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kobe, Japan
|
Quote:
Of course, if the live does big, big dollar, it makes it that much more likely we'll finally see the manga animated to completion.
__________________
|
|
2012-05-17, 14:41 | Link #27 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
- A PSP game. - An OVA remake of Kyoto. - A reboot of the manga. - A Live Action film. ...And not the goddamn animated Jinchu arc, which is what every single Kenshin fan has been begging for all these years. But as it is, even if (and that's one hell of an if) this attempted revival generates enough money for them to consider a TV series adaptation of Jinchu profitable, I still don't trust the people responsible for the Seisouhen and Shin Kyoto Hen OVAs to be able to get it and do it justice. If only an actually competent studio would rescue the franchise from DEEN's carcinogenic hands... Oh well, I suppose that for now I'll just take solace in Kinema Ban and its actual Watsuki writing. |
||
|
|