2008-05-25, 16:02 | Link #81 | ||
…Nothing More
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Age: 44
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2008-05-25, 16:09 | Link #82 | |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
I hope you keep the tag system NightWish, at least for thread creators; it's really neat way to link to other threads.
Quote:
I mentioned all of these changes long ago... and they are all for the greater good, hopefully.
__________________
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:17 | Link #86 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Quote:
"There is truth in advertising!"... oh wait.
__________________
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:18 | Link #88 | |
Love Yourself
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northeast USA
Age: 38
|
I wonder if the album feature (and to some extent, the social group feature, since albums can be attached to that) would remove the need for a lot of the posts in the Fan Creations forum? A lot of those threads are for showing off art; I'm not sure what the limitations and usage of the album feature is, but it seems to me that people could put up images there (strain on the forums?) and I presume others can comment on them.
edit: Maybe that'd work for the sig makers, but definitely not for the photographers and wallpaper-makers! Quote:
__________________
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:23 | Link #89 |
…Nothing More
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Age: 44
|
That is how it works, though the file sizes, number of images, dimensions, etc. all need tweaking over time if it is to be used long term. Do not get too attached to it or assume it will make a good replacement for ImageHost, ImageShack, etc. because it won't. Strain on the forums is exactly the potential problem, we'll just have to see how it pans out... I am open minded about it, but I cannot see it replacing the user centric fan-creation discussion threads.
|
2008-05-25, 16:28 | Link #90 | |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
Quote:
Well, is it really wrong? Some people feel that's a good source to read flamming, so I suppose it's well tagged. The tags are only relevent if people are going to get what they are searching. So even if it's "wrong" as long as it points to what some people might be searching it's tagged right... (no offence to those who post there; I havent even read much into it) If someone were to tag the tutorial thread as "amusing" that would be correct if suppose there are a lot of funny discussion. I can see how some people may feel it's diverging from the purpose of the thread; that's not the point with tags. Some general good practices when tagging:
__________________
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:29 | Link #91 | |
~ You're dead ^__^* ~
Graphic Designer
|
Quote:
I see joke tagging like this is funny and acceptable only if used correctly And that was a stroke of genius! Dam, I need to think of some witty ones @ relentlessflame ~ I just refuse to make an account no matter how much my friends try to poke me. If they want to inform me of anything, they can use msn
__________________
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:31 | Link #92 | |
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
Quote:
If it's the former, that confuses me because the only difference between now and then is that you can see who's been seeing it. It doesn't mention how frequently though, so I can't really see the stalker angle. If it's the latter I can understand and respect that. There are some who don't wish to take part in such features and I believe they should toggle them off if they choose to. Like you I don't mind knowing who's been seeing my profile. It doesn't really bother me and there really isn't anyone here who makes me feel uncomfortable to the point that I'd rather they not know things about me. To a point of course, but being able to add/remove such details from my profile is something I like being in control of. I like Cat's idea about restricting tag use to thread creator/site staff though. It would help cut down on random tags immensely and it would make it easier to moderate/report, if the feature stays.
__________________
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:31 | Link #93 | |
Love Yourself
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northeast USA
Age: 38
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:43 | Link #97 |
AniMexican!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Monterrey N.L. Mexico
|
Sorry if it's a dumb question but....
Is there a way to change the way how Visitor Messages are displayed? I don't like how the new ones always appear on top and would prefer if it were like the rest of the forum were new messages are always at the bottom.
__________________
|
2008-05-25, 16:44 | Link #98 | |
…Nothing More
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Age: 44
|
Quote:
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:47 | Link #99 | |
~ You're dead ^__^* ~
Graphic Designer
|
Quote:
The new posts in the visitor messages read from bottom to top (oldest to newest) which is horribly confusing seen as we are used to reading top to bottom. Need fix
__________________
|
|
2008-05-25, 16:49 | Link #100 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
When I logged in some minutes ago, it said "Welcome, Shana. You last visited: Yesterday at 19:38. Private Messages: Unread 0, Total 89 [Gotta clean it ]. You have: 5 Notifications." And I was like "Ah... I have 5 notifications, let's... WTF? Notifications? *goes to the feedback forum* aaahhh! Forum Upgrade! ".
*Cough* I like the new Profile View. I don't think the tags/bookmarks are really necesary. Aren't the tags the same as the search? After I post it seems like if someone has deleted her/his post. Meh. But still I like the upgrade, it's nice and I think I'll get used to it in a while.
__________________
|
Tags |
feedback, forum upgrade, tags |
|
|