2009-10-20, 11:41 | Link #21 | |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2009-10-20, 11:50 | Link #22 |
Administrator
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Netherlands
Age: 45
|
One solution that might reduce the amount of threads that need to be moved around is to group them by year or season. Most discussions are after all about series that are airing (and being subbed) in the most recent season(s).
This way, once the first airing date of a new series is known, it'll have to be moved from the "Unaired" forum once and then never again. The tricky bit would be what to do with series that span more than two seasons (more than 26 episodes). My suggestion would look something like this: Fall 2009 season The only problem with this design is that past the summer 2009 season it gets a little hard to remember when exactly an anime series aired. So maybe instead of retiring the season forums under "Older series", all threads could also be merged into that forum instead (so all threads from before summer 2009 are in one forum, unless they're still ongoing). In this forum structure, we could use thread prefixes to identify licensed series (or CR, simulcast, etc). |
2009-10-20, 12:05 | Link #23 |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
I would like to see threads of ongoing series separated from threads of shows that are over. I'm not shopping while browsing the forum (not its purpose) so really don't care for the distinction here, any way to get something like a special search/query?
__________________
|
2009-10-20, 15:37 | Link #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Far, far, far away!
Age: 34
|
I personally think that animesuki forums is good as it is now, but I understand that navigation is a bit complicated so I guess that some changes must be made to reduce confusion. After thinking a bit of which way would be easyest to navigate for users or maybe even mods, I com up of this (of course the order in how it is placed could be different):
Ongoing series Fansubbed Licensed Unaired Current Series Older SeriesSo basically yes, nothing changed much, but I just can't see It anyway different. So when animes firs episode is fansubbed or simulcasted It is moved from Unaired to Ongoing series sub-forums. When anime is finished airing in Japan the policy for moving threads would be the same as Current Series sub-forums policy for moving series to the Older Series sub-forums. @GHDpro Personally I think your suggestion would be kinda confusing to navigate.
__________________
|
2009-10-20, 18:47 | Link #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
I think this still keeps the intent of the forums for having a place to discuss fansubs specifically, including potential fansubs i.e. unaired category, without loosing sight of the official releases when the come. This is really the only place like this online |
|
2009-10-20, 21:42 | Link #26 |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
For my part, what I ultimately want is to have one, and only one, single guiding principle that determines where to find thing. It could be:
If you accept this design requirement (which I'm not saying is a requirement, but I consider it certainly a "nice to have"), there are three proposals on the table so far that would seem to meet that requirement:
System 1:
System 2:
System 3:
Personally, I'm sort of leaning towards System 3 assuming we can work out some of the kinks, but this is mostly because it's consistent with the way I think about anime. I think it has the benefits of bringing the newest stuff to the forefront, without the drawbacks of the manual maintenance required by System 2. System 1 is fine, but I personally think licensing is becoming more-and-more murky and confusing, so while I think it should be clearly-noted, I don't think it's the easiest way to find a show in a hierarchy, in general. So I guess I'm sort of voting accessibility over philosophy, but that's just my personal preference. Anyway, I know that's a lot of words, and I'm not trying to say that these are the only three options on the table, but maybe that provides some food for thought. |
2009-10-20, 23:30 | Link #27 |
#1 Akashiya Moka Fan
Author
|
I don't know if this is the appropriate place to ask, but since this thread seems to be the only one remotely talking about the new CR thing, I have one little question:
the ones that have the CR tag in front, will Animesuki be hosting torrents for? I see that they all got moved to the Fansub section, and even the MFI tags were under the licensed section. I haven't seen anything pop up on the torrent page, so currently I'm assuming that even though they're now under fansub, they still won't be listed, but can I get an official clarification?
__________________
|
2009-10-20, 23:47 | Link #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 42
|
Basically I would do something like what AnymX listed. Put all titles which are *currently limited* to a Crunchyroll/Hulu/Whatever official streaming site into an "Online Releases" or somesuch named forum and I would slightly change the description for the "Licensed" forum to make sure it is only for series that are licensed yet NOT being legally streamed and only have a DVD/Blu Ray release.
Fansubbed Online Releases Licensed Unaired Current Series Older Series |
2009-10-21, 01:58 | Link #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
- each thread can be moved up to 3 times: unaired -> fansubbed -> online releases -> licensed - the "licensed" distinction here is a misnomer IMO as some discussed @relentlessflame this might be a radical change to the way things are now, but as an alternative to moving threads around into dedicated forums based on categories that not everyone may agree on, why not just do away with the release classification forums and keep all subbed releases in one forum? Then you'd use a tagging system to classify it's status. And you would not have to worry about moving things around or how to correctly classify each type of release since you wouldn't have a dedicated forum for those types of releases. If a series takes lots of words to describe it's release, you can just use lots of tags or words It'll make it everything easier to keep track of and less overhead for mods. Since the only thread move you'll do is to go from Unaired -> Subbed. Then you can tag a release initially as "fansubbed". Then maybe "prosubbed - CR" or "prosubbed - CR, Hulu, Viz", then maybe later on add "prosubbed - DVD/BD" tags. And likewise for airing status and such IF you don't want an unaired subforum -- those can also be easily identified with tags. e.g. "Airing" or "unaired". Unaired will of course imply unsubbed in this case. Since sub status will be covered by "Airing" + "fansubbed" / "prosubbed - XXX" tags |
|
2009-10-21, 05:43 | Link #30 |
eyewitness
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
My suggestion would be:
I.e. relentlessflame's version 2. I'd keep the organization of the big series (with subforum) as it is. I'd rather avoid mixing threads and subforums on one level. Alternatively, the solo threads could get their own subforum, i.e.
License status can be handled with flags. The move from the current to the older forum can be handled pragmatically, I think. Keep the length of the current forum at about 100 threads. When reaching 120, move everything that has finished airing to the older forum, from the last thread up, until you reach 80. The numbers 80/100/120 are examples of course. That would be 15 min of administrative work per season, I estimate, much less than the constant monitoring of license announcements and subbing status that has to be done regardless. I do not think that organizing series season-wise is a good idea. I already have trouble remembering what started in summer 2008 and what in fall. It would also make any contribution to the older series threads pretty much invisible.
__________________
|
2009-10-21, 11:17 | Link #32 |
Knowledge is the solution
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 39
|
I don't know if it's possible in vbulletin to have multiple thread structure options according to the user likings? Because personally I'd like to see a more season oriented approach to the series, however for people who prefer a ongoing/fansubbed/licensed option maybe they could just select a different setting?
__________________
|
2009-10-21, 11:35 | Link #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
2009-10-21, 14:00 | Link #35 |
ISML Technical Staff
Graphic Designer
|
But the point is the majority (I believe) of the staff believes that CR titles should not be listed as licensed. That was the reason for the change in the first place, to give it a status that is "less than licensed" (for lack of a better phrase) while still recognizing that it is simulcasted.
__________________
|
2009-10-21, 14:09 | Link #36 |
Knowledge is the solution
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 39
|
Personally I don't really agree with that position. The point of fansubs in the first place was to increase the west awareness to a certain title, or to anime in general. Once a title is easily available for the western audience the role of fansubs is over right then and there, which is the whole idea behind 'licensing' in the fansub community (whoever respects it in any case, a group which Animesuki I believe belongs to). Something is considered licensed in the west not because it is printed in round shiny disks, but because you can legally acquire the media in whatever form, be it vhs tapes, dvd's, vcd's or internet streams.
__________________
|
2009-10-21, 14:56 | Link #37 | |
Translator, Producer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Age: 44
|
Quote:
Here's a question for you: Say a PBS station in hawaii goes and buys "dennou coil", subtitles it in english and broadcasts it on their local station. Is Dennou Coil licensed? CR should be considered in the same category as a broadcaster, not so much as a licensor, because they sell subscriptions for high quality streaming and early access but not for owning media. CR is like a TV station in that regard, it makes money from subscription fees and ad-revenue. In fact, animax broadcasts english versions of many "unlicensed" shows in countries around the world subbed (or even dubbed) in english. One of these days that might expand to the US, and at that time how will one classify those shows?
__________________
|
|
2009-10-21, 15:11 | Link #39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Age: 36
|
Quote:
1. Technically, R1 DVD's are just as region restricted as CR. 2. Unlike a TV broadcast, you can rewatch CR shows at any time. |
|
2009-10-21, 15:31 | Link #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
Although there are easy ways around it, even licensed for US DVD release is still technically geography limited. |
|
|
|